<1> Welcome to the inaugural volume of Aphra Behn Online, a
new, interactive scholarly journal.
ABOnline offers something different for scholars and students alike
in that it focuses exclusively on the issues related to women in
the arts from 1640 to 1830, and it provides cutting edge work in
an open access, online format that allows for readers to post
comments and engage in a conversation about the ideas presented.
<2> This volume is
organized around the theme of women’s poetry in recognition of
the landmark publication of the
Paula R.
Backscheider and
Catherine E. Ingrassia edition,
British Women Poets of the Long Eighteenth Century
(Johns Hopkins UP, 2009), which will redefine the content of
eighteenth-century literature courses around the globe.
Backscheider and Ingrassia’s anthology builds upon the important
recovery work done by
Germaine Greer (1988) and
Roger Lonsdale (1989) who introduced readers to
long-ignored female poets, but this updated volume greatly
expands our range of poetic voices and the representation of
poems by individual authors. Backscheider and Ingrassia benefit
from two decades of research and editing produced by feminist
scholars since the Greer and Lonsdale anthologies, and their
volume stands as a measure of what we have accomplished and what
we have yet to do.
<3> The massive book
(roughly 950 pages) presents 368 complete poems by 80 poets and
is supplemented with generous and informative introductions to
each section. Despite the expanded range of this book, the
editors remain “painfully conscious of the poets and poems we
have not been able to include” (xxix). Some authors, such as
Frances Greville, Elizabeth Molesworth, or Hester Thrale Piozzi,
are represented by only one poem, whereas the major female poets
(Anne Finch, Charlotte Smith, Anna Laetitia Barbauld) have each
over a dozen poems included. For those of us that teach
eighteenth-century women writers, the book is a cornucopia of
possibilities. For those of us who just want to read more poetry
by women, the anthology is an exciting roadmap of discovery.
<4> Backscheider and
Ingrassia organize their volume thematically, rather than by the
more standard author/date or alphabetical methods. They do so in
order to highlight the
diversity of content and style in the women poets, and so that
patterns of topics emerge which allow for a more rigorous
analysis and understanding of individual poets’ work. The
approach also provides a kind of history of poetic forms,
whereas chronological organization can actually obscure the way
an individual author responds to the literary and cultural
discourses in which she is participating (xxxi). Like any good
anthology, British Women
Poets of the Long Eighteenth-Century is a treasure trove of
favorites, like Behn, Wortley Montagu, Seward, and new
discoveries, such as Elizabeth Hands and Jane Cave Winscom. The
editors challenge us to see the historical context and social
purpose of women’s poetry in far more complicated ways than has
been the case in the past. In addition to short biographies of
the poets, the editors also helpfully include a section on “How
to Read Eighteenth-Century Poetry” that features the kind of
analytical questions readers might ask, as well as a
mini-tutorial on meter, scansion, rhyme, and figurative
language.
<5> Thus we
are particularly delighted to have
Catherine Ingrassia’s contribution to our first
volume of ABOnline,
along with the work of several other established and emerging
critics of eighteenth-century literature. Ingrassia’s essay
analyzes the representation of violence and social protest
around the Bristol Bridge Riot of 1793 in three poems by Jane
Cave Winscom. While Ingrassia enlightens us on a relatively
unknown female poet and her historical significance,
Claudia
Thomas Kairoff offers an intervention in our
understanding of better known poets Charlotte Smith and Anna
Seward. Kairoff, who will be publishing a monograph on Seward
later this year with
Johns Hopkins UP,
demonstrates how Seward has been wrongly dismissed as a
sonneteer in the wake of Smith’s Romantic admirers. Providing a
convincingly new reading of a frequently visited poem of Lady
Mary Wortley Montagu,
Danielle
Bobker argues that “Reasons
That Induced Dr S[wift] to Write a Poem Call’d the Lady’s
Dressing Room,” belongs in the tradition of the seventeenth-century impotence poem and
also makes an important statement about print culture. At the
far reach of our chronological scope,
Katharine Kittredge examines the Victorian reception
of the popular – and yet relatively unknown to us – poet and
memoirist Melesina Trench as a cautionary tale in feminist
literary history. In our book review section, you will find
coverage of three recent monographs on eighteenth-century
women’s poetry.
<6> Two unique features of Aphra Behn Online include our sections devoted to issues of pedagogy
and to Women on the Web. In pedagogy, we are pleased to have an
essay by
Elizabeth Kraft
who makes concrete the process of reading eighteenth-century
poems out loud in the classroom and the research that an ethical
reading might entail. She juxtaposes the example of Swift’s 1719
birthday poem to Stella and Barbauld’s “The Mouse’s Petition” in
an article that contains hyperlinks and audio files to
renditions of the poems read out loud. In our technology
section,
Emily Bowles
offers us a thoughtful review of tools on eighteenth-century
women poets available on the web and suggests how future
contributors might participate in this type of writing.
<7> We encourage you to read through our journal and leave a
response. Please also take a look at the call for submissions
for next year’s volume, which will be centered on the theme of
accessibility, broadly understood. Enjoy!